| AL | W | PW | RW Magic # |
| East | |||
| Tampa Bay | 88 | 97 | 9 |
| Boston | 87 | 96 | 11 |
| Central | |||
| Minnesota | 82 | 90 | 9 |
| Chicago Sox | 81 | 90 | 10 |
| West | |||
| x-LA Angels | 91 | 99 | 0 |
| Wild Card | |||
| Boston | 87 | 96 | 4 |
| Minnesota | 82 | 90 | 15 |
| NL | |||
| East | |||
| NY Mets | 83 | 92 | 7 |
| Philadelphia | 81 | 89 | 12 |
| Central | |||
| Chicago Cubs | 88 | 98 | 4 |
| Milwaukee | 83 | 91 | 16 |
| West | |||
| LA Dodgers | 77 | 84 | 4 |
| Arizona | 72 | 80 | 13 |
| Wild Card | |||
| Milwaukee | 83 | 91 | 7 |
| Philadelphia | 81 | 89 | 11 |
Showing posts with label number. Show all posts
Showing posts with label number. Show all posts
Saturday, September 13, 2008
14: Real World Magic Number, Little Action
All those rainouts so little action again tonight. A couple of teams have shortened their RWM#, though not too much.
Labels:
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
magic,
magic #,
magic number,
mets,
mlb,
number,
phillies,
pythagorean,
rays,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
twins,
white sox
15: Not Much Action Due to Ike
I will be posting only the new Real World Magic Number stat from here on out, unless there is a compelling change in results or other reason. For now, I will see how this RWM# works as an actual predictor of the course of events over the next few weeks. The only changes from yesterday due to the major storms around the East Coast were the Rays and Red Sox both reducing their numbers, as well as the White Sox and the Dodgers, all by 1.
PS: Kudos to ESPN for incorporating an expanded version of standings that takes into account some of the same things I do, and also utilizes a similar system as BaseballProspectus. They are using Coolstanding to get their playoff odds data. Both Coolstanding and BP use Monte Carlo simulations for their predictions, where I simply use a derivative of Pythagorean Expectation and actual performance for my predictions. As I pointed out before, these numbers are highly correlated and usually the same.
| AL | W | PW | RW Magic # |
| East | |||
| Tampa Bay | 87 | 97 | 10 |
| Boston | 86 | 96 | 12 |
| Central | |||
| Chicago Sox | 81 | 90 | 9 |
| Minnesota | 80 | 89 | 11 |
| West | |||
| x-LA Angels | 90 | 98 | 0 |
| Wild Card | |||
| Boston | 86 | 96 | 4 |
| Minnesota | 80 | 89 | 17 |
| NL | |||
| East | |||
| NY Mets | 82 | 92 | 8 |
| Philadelphia | 80 | 89 | 13 |
| Central | |||
| Chicago Cubs | 88 | 98 | 4 |
| Milwaukee | 83 | 91 | 16 |
| West | |||
| LA Dodgers | 76 | 84 | 5 |
| Arizona | 72 | 80 | 13 |
| Wild Card | |||
| Milwaukee | 83 | 91 | 7 |
| Philadelphia | 80 | 89 | 12 |
Labels:
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
magic,
magic #,
magic number,
mlb,
number,
pythagorean,
rays,
real,
red sox,
white sox,
world
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Playoff "Real World" Magic Number, next up to clinch: Cubs
| AL | |||
| East | W | PW | RW Magic # |
| Tampa Bay | 87 | 97 | 9 |
| Boston | 85 | 95 | 13 |
| Central | |||
| Chicago Sox | 81 | 90 | 9 |
| Minnesota | 80 | 89 | 11 |
| West | |||
| x-LA Angels | 88 | 97 | 0 |
| Wild Card | |||
| Boston | 85 | 95 | 5 |
| Minnesota | 80 | 89 | 16 |
| NL | |||
| East | |||
| NY Mets | 82 | 92 | 8 |
| Philadelphia | 80 | 89 | 13 |
| Central | |||
| Chicago Cubs | 88 | 98 | 4 |
| Milwaukee | 83 | 91 | 16 |
| West | |||
| LA Dodgers | 75 | 83 | 6 |
| Arizona | 71 | 80 | 13 |
| Wild Card | |||
| Milwaukee | 83 | 91 | 7 |
| Philadelphia | 80 | 89 | 12 |
Labels:
bill james,
card,
cubs,
dodgers,
magic,
major,
mlb,
number,
phillies,
predictive,
pythagorean,
rays,
record,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox,
wild
A New Way to the Magic Number
Later this evening I will be posting a new "version" of the Magic Number. The way this has been calculated is by taking the predicted finish of the second place team, and subtracting the number of games left to achieve that number of games. So for instance, the Cubs' real Magic Number is 13, but subtracting out the expected games that Milwaukee is expected to lose according to their pythagorean record, the "real world" Magic Number, or RW Magic #, is actually less than that, closer to 6.
One thing different about the RW Magic # is that it does not figure in opponent's losses. So if the Cubs have an RW M# of 6, that means they have to win 6 games by the end of the season and that should be all it takes. Of course, this number will change as the second place team goes on a winning streak, but will stay the same if they play according to their predicted wins.
If anyone is interested in the actual formula, let me know and I will post it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)