Showing posts with label twins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label twins. Show all posts
Monday, September 29, 2008
White Sox Vs. Twins in One-Game Playoff Tomorrow--Who Wins?
Based on the fact that White Sox are at home tomorrow, where they sport a lofty 0.643 pythagorean winning percentage, and that the Twins will bring their less-than-stellar 0.450 pythagorean road winning percentage, the Sox have a 69% chance of facing the Rays on Thursday, using the log5 win probability.
Labels:
al central,
ALCS,
american,
baseball,
bill james,
chances,
chicago,
log5,
minnesota,
mlb,
one-game,
playoffs,
prediction,
pythagorean,
sabermetrics,
sox,
twins,
white sox
Sunday, September 28, 2008
White Sox Have Good Chance to Tie for the NL Central Title Tomorrow
The White Sox have a 67% chance of beating the Tigers tomorrow and taking this into a Tuesday one-game playoff with the Twins. Very cool.
Labels:
al central,
ALCS,
baseball,
bill james,
chicago,
log5,
minnesota,
mlb,
one-game,
playoffs,
prediction,
pythagorean,
sabermetrics,
twins,
white sox
Playoff Prediction or Fun With Pythagorean, Log5 and Probabilities: Cubs, Phillies, Red Sox Will Advance
Alright folks (all 60 of you now!), you'll hear it here first: the Red Sox will upset the Angels. The Red Sox have an almost 60% chance of taking the series, mostly on the strength of better record on the road, and an unbelievable record at home.
The Rays will almost certainly beat whoever they play, be it the depleted Twins or depleted White Sox.
The Cubs, on the strength of an excellent road record, also have a great chance to proceed to the NLCS, 67% (the most of any of the post-season aspirants). Their home record vs. the road record of the Dodgers is very big, and their excellent road record can almost nullify the great home advantage of the Dodgers. On the other hand, should the Dodgers steal one at Wrigley, that would probably have a significant effect on the outcome.
Phillies should beat the Brewers (57% chance), and that might be more true considering how much Milwaukee's staff was battered and overworked in the last week (except when CC Sabathia pitched).
| ALDS | H PWP | A PWP | Odds to | Odds to Sweep |
| Angels | 0.525 | 0.554 | 41% | 9% |
| Red Sox | 0.658 | 0.536 | 59% | 16% |
| Rays | 0.628 | 0.514 | x% | x% |
| Twins/WS | 0.xxx | 0.xxx | x% | x% |
| NLDS | ||||
| Cubs | 0.642 | 0.596 | 67% | 21% |
| Dodgers | 0.637 | 0.456 | 33% | 6% |
| Phillies | 0.588 | 0.561 | 58% | 16% |
| Brewers | 0.558 | 0.522 | 42% | 9% |
H PWP = Home Pythagorean Winning Percentage
A PWP = Away Pythagorean Winning Percentage
These numbers were used to calculate the log5 win probabilities for each team and each game in the series. No I did not look at pitcher vs. team since the sample size is too small.
Labels:
angels,
baseball,
brewers,
cubs,
dodgers,
log5,
mlb,
NLCS,
phillies,
playoffs,
prediction,
probability,
pythagorean,
rays,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
twins,
white sox,
wild
Today's Win Probabilities for the Mets, Brewers, White Sox and Twins
It all comes down to one day, one game, to determine two divisional races.
The Mets have a 54% chance of winning their game; the Brewers only a 42% of winning theirs (based on log5, as explained yesterday). For the Brewers to win the Wild Card today, we multiply their odds of winning to the odds of the Mets losing, then vice versa for the Mets to win it:
Brewers, 42% x (1-54%) = 20%
Mets, 54% x (1-42%) = 31%
Tie Today, either by both winning or both losing, (42% x 54%) + ((1 - 42%) x (1 - 54%)) = 49%
As of now, the Mets and Marlins are tied 0-0 in the 3rd, while the Cubs have taken 1-0 lead in the first.
As for the Twins and White Sox, their situation is a little different. Two things have to happen for the White Sox to win the division--they have to win and the Twins lose, then play a one-game playoff. Whereas the Twins just need to hold serve:
Twins, 74% chance to win division (based on log5 win probability to beat the Royals)
White Sox, 70% x (1 - 74%) = 18% (Sox win AND Twins lose) just to tie for the NL Central
As of now, Sox lead 3-1 over Cleveland in the 3rd, and Twins/Royals 0-0.
Who do the odds favor to reach the post-season, then? Well, Twins and Mets have the better chances to outlast their opponents, though it will be much harder for the Mets.
And just a side note to Mets' fans--this team has lost Billy Wagner, John Maine and Ryan Church for extended portions of the season, long enough to have probably cost them the division. That they are even in this situation is a testament to the team (players and manager) in overcoming these obstacles. With those three playing the full season, they are about equal to the Cubs in performance.
UPDATE and OOOPS!: With the White Sox win today, they force their remaining game to be played--I hadn't taken that into account. So the Twins are done, and now have to wait until tomorrow to see if the tie happens or they win.
Labels:
al central,
ALCS,
baseball,
bill james,
chances,
mets,
mlb,
predictive,
probability,
pythagorean,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Saturday, September 27, 2008
1: I Think It'll Be A Playoff Game For the Mets/Brewers; Twins Will Upset the White Sox
I had predicted a Subway Series back in June. Did the Carlos Quentin injury do in the Sox? How about the Contreras injury? In either case, it doesn't look good for the Sox, who have to win their last game and hope that the Royals sweep the Twins.
It's definitely looking like the Brewers and Mets will end up in a one-game playoff. Santana was rock-solid today, but it's the unpredictable Oliver Perez going tomorrow for the Mets, and the very predictable and wins except against the Cubs, CC Sabathia.
I love this game!
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| x-Tampa Bay | .596 | .571 | 97 | 65 | 4 |
| y-Boston | .588 | .600 | 95 | 67 | -2 |
| NY Yankees | .550 | .539 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Toronto | .528 | .572 | 86 | 76 | -7 |
| Baltimore | .425 | .453 | 69 | 93 | -4 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Minnesota | .540 | .550 | 88 | 74 | -2 |
| Chicago Sox | .538 | .547 | 87 | 75 | -1 |
| Cleveland | .503 | .531 | 82 | 80 | -4 |
| Detroit | .463 | .482 | 75 | 87 | -3 |
| Kansas City | .466 | .443 | 75 | 87 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| *-LA Angels | .615 | .542 | 100 | 62 | 12 |
| Texas | .491 | .468 | 79 | 83 | 4 |
| Oakland | .469 | .468 | 76 | 86 | 0 |
| Seattle | .373 | .405 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| x-Philadelphia | .565 | .577 | 92 | 70 | -2 |
| NY Mets | .553 | .557 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Florida | .519 | .501 | 84 | 78 | 3 |
| Atlanta | .447 | .485 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .369 | .379 | 60 | 102 | -2 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| *-Chicago Cubs | .606 | .620 | 98 | 64 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .553 | .541 | 90 | 72 | 2 |
| Houston | .531 | .477 | 86 | 76 | 9 |
| St. Louis | .528 | .532 | 86 | 76 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .460 | .440 | 74 | 88 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | .410 | .405 | 66 | 96 | 1 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Dodgers | .522 | .540 | 85 | 77 | -3 |
| Arizona | .503 | .509 | 82 | 80 | -1 |
| Colorado | .460 | .453 | 74 | 88 | 1 |
| San Francisco | .441 | .414 | 71 | 91 | 4 |
| San Diego | .391 | .413 | 63 | 99 | -4 |
Labels:
ALCS,
baseball,
bill james,
brewers,
mets,
mlb,
NLCS,
playoffs,
predictive,
probability,
pythagorean,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Fun With Probabilities: Brewers/Twins have best shot at postseason
I'm sure every one of my 34 regular readers (according to Google Analytics!) went immediately to their trusty Texas Instruments TI-35 calculators and used my probabilities from yesterdays' posts to calculate overall odds of making the post season for their favorite teams.
You mean you didn't?
OK, then, let's take a look from the spreadsheet. The beauty of probabilities, statistically speaking is that they can be added, subtracted and multiplied to come up with odds of combinations and odds of mutual exclusivity, among the many other possibilities. Here, we'll really look at the combinatorial property.
Before I delve into this, I want to point out that the best description of what I'm doing comes from DiamondMind Baseball. I first posted my playoff version of Bill James Log5 theorem in 2005. What I will be doing in the playoffs is exactly what they describe. You can also find my original description on BigShouldersSports, where I used to occasionally contribute. In essence, I take the home team's winning percentage at home vs. the away teams road winning percentage, all using the pythagorean expectations formula as used during the season, to compute a probability of victory in each game of the series. I then use the combinatorial mathematics to come up with the odds of sweeping, winning two games, or winning just one for each team. As you will see in the playoffs, this also will take into account all five or seven games.
For now, though, we've already had one game, so the odds have changed a little. Looking at the numbers for the Brewers, they have a 49% chance of beating the Cubs twice (since they won last night). The Mets have only a 29% chance of winning two games. The Brewers also have a 33% of winning one game, Mets have a 50% of doing so, facing easier competition. If both teams win one game or both teams win two games, then they end up tied, so we add up both of those probabilities for each team and multiply to get the odds of this happening, which is 64%.
But unfortunately, for the Mets, because they lost yesterday, they do not have the ability to sweep their series and will therefore have to hope that the Brewers will lose at least one game. Otherwise, the chances of the Brewers winning the Wild Card are 59% (odds of sweeping plus odds of winning two games plus odds of winning one game while the Mets lose two plus Mets losing one plus Mets being swept). Those same odds in reverse, i.e. for the Mets to win the WC, are 41%.
If you're wondering why some of those numbers don't total one hundred, it's because these possibilities are mutually exclusive, meaning they exist on their own (this is something I'm sure my regular visitors already know, but I include it in case I get some new visitors that might not). That is not true, though, for the Mets probability (P) of winning, that is exactly 41% because it is calculated 100% (Mets OR Brewers win P) minus 59% (Brewers win P).
Calculating the same for the White Sox and Twins, we get, respectively, 43% and 57%. Best way to check a probability is to do a gut-level check: Twins are playing the Royals, who are the worst team in the league, whereas the Sox are playing the Indians, which are in third place in the division. So the Sox have a tougher schedule.
Labels:
al central,
baseball,
bill james,
log5,
mlb,
playoffs,
prediction,
pythagorean,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Friday, September 26, 2008
2: Dead Heat in the AL Central; Brewers Back In the Driver's Seat
Nothing I can add beyond the title--will be interesting.
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| z-Tampa Bay | .600 | .572 | 97 | 65 | 5 |
| z-Boston | .588 | .600 | 95 | 67 | -2 |
| NY Yankees | .550 | .539 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Toronto | .531 | .573 | 86 | 76 | -7 |
| Baltimore | .421 | .452 | 68 | 94 | -5 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Minnesota | .544 | .552 | 88 | 74 | -1 |
| Chicago Sox | .541 | .551 | 88 | 74 | -2 |
| Cleveland | .500 | .527 | 81 | 81 | -4 |
| Detroit | .459 | .482 | 74 | 88 | -4 |
| Kansas City | .463 | .441 | 75 | 87 | 3 |
| WEST | |||||
| *-LA Angels | .619 | .545 | 100 | 62 | 12 |
| Texas | .488 | .466 | 79 | 83 | 3 |
| Oakland | .472 | .470 | 76 | 86 | 0 |
| Seattle | .369 | .402 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .563 | .577 | 91 | 71 | -2 |
| NY Mets | .550 | .556 | 89 | 73 | -1 |
| Florida | .522 | .502 | 85 | 77 | 3 |
| Atlanta | .444 | .481 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .371 | .379 | 60 | 102 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| *-Chicago Cubs | .604 | .619 | 98 | 64 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .556 | .544 | 90 | 72 | 2 |
| Houston | .535 | .481 | 86 | 76 | 9 |
| St. Louis | .525 | .530 | 85 | 77 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .463 | .442 | 75 | 87 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | .413 | .406 | 67 | 95 | 1 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Dodgers | .522 | .541 | 85 | 77 | -3 |
| Arizona | .500 | .508 | 81 | 81 | -1 |
| Colorado | .463 | .454 | 75 | 87 | 1 |
| San Francisco | .440 | .413 | 71 | 91 | 4 |
| San Diego | .388 | .412 | 63 | 99 | -4 |
Labels:
al central,
ALCS,
baseball,
bill james,
mlb,
NLCS,
phillies,
prediction,
predictive,
pythagorean,
record,
sabermetrics,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Updated, and Now, AL, too
Updated probabilities, plus I've finally included the White Sox and Twins. So how does it look for our finalists, some of whom will go home with consolation prizes (a higher draft pick next summer?).
Important places to look below: the Brewers have an 18% chance to sweep the Cubs, but even if they win only two, their chances of winning two now is almost 50/50. That is in stark contrast to the Mets who have only a 50/50 chance of winning ONE game. The Phillies have practically clinched, so they're not even in the equation anymore. If the Brewers win one more game, that will probably knock the Mets off (sorry, Mets fans).
I think I have to say sorry to White Sox fans also: they have to win the next two games to guarantee a tie, whereas the Twins, winning two games, will win the division. In the immortal words of The Jam, "Here Comes The Weekend"!
| sweep | 2-wins | 1-win | |
| Cubs | 0.0% | 33.1% | 48.9% |
| Brewers | 18.1% | 48.9% | 33.1% |
| Phillies | 45.4% | 43.9% | 10.6% |
| Nationals | 0.0% | 10.6% | 43.9% |
| Mets | 0.0% | 28.6% | 49.8% |
| Marlins | 21.6% | 49.8% | 28.6% |
| White Sox | 0.0% | 48.2% | 42.4% |
| Indians | 9.3% | 42.4% | 48.2% |
| Twins | 0.0% | 55.2% | 38.2% |
| KC | 6.6% | 38.2% | 55.2% |
Labels:
al central,
ALCS,
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
log5,
mets,
mlb,
NLCS,
phillies,
playoffs,
prediction,
pythagorean,
record,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Thursday, September 25, 2008
3: Twins' Dome Sweeps the Sox Out of First, Mets/Brewers Tied--2 games for Any One of Them Will Put Them in the Playoffs
The Mets great game tonight keeps them in contention with the Brewers after their extra inning affair. Boy--the Pirates are the tonic for what ails you in the NL. And the Twins now have the upper hand over the White Sox. This is going to be a great weekend for baseball!
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| z-Tampa Bay | .604 | .574 | 98 | 64 | 5 |
| z-Boston | .591 | .609 | 96 | 66 | -3 |
| NY Yankees | .547 | .533 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Toronto | .528 | .571 | 86 | 76 | -7 |
| Baltimore | .424 | .454 | 69 | 93 | -5 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Minnesota | .547 | .557 | 89 | 73 | -2 |
| Chicago Sox | .544 | .554 | 88 | 74 | -2 |
| Cleveland | .497 | .526 | 81 | 81 | -5 |
| Detroit | .456 | .480 | 74 | 88 | -4 |
| Kansas City | .459 | .436 | 74 | 88 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .620 | .552 | 100 | 62 | 11 |
| Texas | .484 | .460 | 78 | 84 | 4 |
| Oakland | .475 | .472 | 77 | 85 | 1 |
| Seattle | .367 | .400 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .560 | .575 | 91 | 71 | -2 |
| NY Mets | .553 | .559 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Florida | .519 | .499 | 84 | 78 | 3 |
| Atlanta | .447 | .481 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .373 | .381 | 61 | 101 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| *-Chicago Cubs | .608 | .622 | 98 | 64 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .553 | .542 | 90 | 72 | 2 |
| Houston | .532 | .480 | 86 | 76 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .522 | .529 | 85 | 77 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .465 | .442 | 75 | 87 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh | .409 | .403 | 66 | 96 | 1 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Dodgers | .525 | .542 | 85 | 77 | -3 |
| Arizona | .497 | .506 | 81 | 81 | -2 |
| Colorado | .465 | .455 | 75 | 87 | 2 |
| San Francisco | .440 | .413 | 71 | 91 | 4 |
| San Diego | .386 | .412 | 63 | 99 | -4 |
Labels:
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
mets,
mlb,
NLCS,
phillies,
playoffs,
prediction,
predictive,
pythagorean,
rays,
record,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
4: White Sox Need to Win Two More Games; One-Game Playoff Between Mets & Brewers?
And it would help if they win one of those tomorrow against the Twins or there will be no chance for a Subway Series this year, just in time for the 102nd anniversary of the first one (Cubs vs. Sox in 1906).
And interestingly, the Phillies should still win the NL East, and it looks like a tie now between the Brewers and hapless Mets (subject of a special post from the game tomorrow at Shea Stadium). The Cubs are practically in the weird position to pick their opponent for the NLCS.
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| z-Tampa Bay | .608 | .576 | 98 | 64 | 5 |
| z-Boston | .589 | .606 | 95 | 67 | -3 |
| NY Yankees | .551 | .537 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Toronto | .525 | .567 | 85 | 77 | -7 |
| Baltimore | .424 | .454 | 69 | 93 | -5 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .548 | .555 | 89 | 73 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .544 | .556 | 88 | 74 | -2 |
| Cleveland | .500 | .529 | 81 | 81 | -5 |
| Detroit | .452 | .479 | 73 | 89 | -4 |
| Kansas City | .459 | .436 | 74 | 88 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .618 | .552 | 100 | 62 | 11 |
| Texas | .484 | .460 | 78 | 84 | 4 |
| Oakland | .475 | .472 | 77 | 85 | 1 |
| Seattle | .369 | .400 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .560 | .575 | 91 | 71 | -2 |
| NY Mets | .551 | .559 | 89 | 73 | -1 |
| Florida | .519 | .499 | 84 | 78 | 3 |
| Atlanta | .447 | .481 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .373 | .381 | 61 | 101 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| *-Chicago Cubs | .611 | .623 | 99 | 63 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .551 | .539 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Houston | .529 | .479 | 85 | 77 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .519 | .523 | 84 | 78 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .468 | .443 | 76 | 86 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh | .411 | .405 | 67 | 95 | 1 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .522 | .537 | 85 | 77 | -2 |
| Arizona | .500 | .513 | 81 | 81 | -2 |
| Colorado | .459 | .447 | 74 | 88 | 2 |
| San Francisco | .446 | .419 | 72 | 90 | 4 |
| San Diego | .389 | .416 | 63 | 99 | -4 |
Labels:
al central,
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
mets,
phillies,
playoffs,
prediction,
predictive,
pythagorean,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
5: All the Phillies Met at a Brewer-y; White Sox Have Twins?
There's really only one race in the NL, but with two parts: Phillies over Mets, Mets over Brewers. I think the Brewers are going to come up short based on who they have to play over the weekend, but it should still be interesting.
In the AL, it's just one race, Sox vs. Twins. The Sox should be able to eke it out, but the Twins are not going down easy. This closeness is probably the one game of difference Carlos Quentin's injury has wrought.
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| z-Tampa Bay | .605 | .573 | 98 | 64 | 5 |
| z-Boston | .586 | .606 | 95 | 67 | -3 |
| NY Yankees | .548 | .534 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Toronto | .529 | .570 | 86 | 76 | -7 |
| Baltimore | .427 | .456 | 69 | 93 | -5 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .551 | .556 | 89 | 73 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .541 | .556 | 88 | 74 | -2 |
| Cleveland | .503 | .530 | 82 | 80 | -4 |
| Detroit | .455 | .483 | 74 | 88 | -4 |
| Kansas City | .456 | .431 | 74 | 88 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .618 | .552 | 100 | 62 | 11 |
| Texas | .484 | .460 | 78 | 84 | 4 |
| Oakland | .475 | .472 | 77 | 85 | 1 |
| Seattle | .369 | .400 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .563 | .580 | 91 | 71 | -3 |
| NY Mets | .554 | .562 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Florida | .516 | .495 | 83 | 79 | 3 |
| Atlanta | .443 | .477 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .376 | .383 | 61 | 101 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| *-Chicago Cubs | .609 | .623 | 99 | 63 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .548 | .538 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Houston | .526 | .475 | 85 | 77 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .516 | .522 | 84 | 78 | -1 |
| Pittsburgh | .414 | .406 | 67 | 95 | 1 |
| Cincinnati | .471 | .446 | 76 | 86 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .522 | .537 | 85 | 77 | -2 |
| Arizona | .503 | .514 | 82 | 80 | -2 |
| Colorado | .459 | .447 | 74 | 88 | 2 |
| San Francisco | .446 | .419 | 72 | 90 | 4 |
| San Diego | .389 | .416 | 63 | 99 | -4 |
Labels:
al central,
ALCS,
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
mets,
mlb,
NLCS,
phillies,
playoffs,
prediction,
predictive,
pythagorean,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Sunday, September 21, 2008
7: A Week From Today, There Will Be Two Less "Old" Stadiums...
Yeah, it was a tear-jerker earlier this evening watching the last game in a storied ballpark. I still don't know why it needs to be replaced, but hey, I'm not the fire inspector. I'm looking forward to the Cubs at the Mets on Thursday, when I have tickets to see one of the last games at Shea.
I've already put together the log5 predictions for the playoffs based on current standings, and it's going to be an interesting post-season. Let's put it this way: the top two teams in each league do NOT have an easy path to the World Series. More on that later in the week.
For now, it looks like the Phillies can beat the annually free-falling Mets, but they'll both make the playoffs. Either way, one or the other will be playing the Dodgers, and it won't be as easy a victory as it seems. Same with the Cubs and the eventual Wild Card.
The Angels will not have an easy time with Boston, nor will the Rays have an easy time with the White Sox.
Did I just say the Cubs and the White Sox will be in the playoffs in the same year? Can you say Subway Series? Enjoy the last week!
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| z-Tampa Bay | .597 | .570 | 97 | 65 | 5 |
| Boston | .587 | .607 | 95 | 67 | -3 |
| NY Yankees | .545 | .533 | 88 | 74 | 2 |
| Toronto | .532 | .572 | 86 | 76 | -6 |
| Baltimore | .435 | .460 | 71 | 91 | -4 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .555 | .560 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .538 | .552 | 87 | 75 | -2 |
| Cleveland | .503 | .530 | 82 | 80 | -4 |
| Kansas City | .449 | .425 | 73 | 89 | 4 |
| Detroit | .461 | .488 | 75 | 87 | -4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .619 | .554 | 100 | 62 | 11 |
| Texas | .481 | .453 | 78 | 84 | 5 |
| Oakland | .477 | .479 | 77 | 85 | 0 |
| Seattle | .368 | .397 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .564 | .578 | 91 | 71 | -2 |
| NY Mets | .555 | .563 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Florida | .523 | .500 | 85 | 78 | 4 |
| Atlanta | .442 | .479 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .372 | .378 | 60 | 102 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| x-Chicago Cubs | .610 | .624 | 99 | 63 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .545 | .537 | 88 | 74 | 1 |
| Houston | .529 | .476 | 85 | 77 | 9 |
| St. Louis | .516 | .522 | 84 | 78 | -1 |
| Pittsburgh | .417 | .407 | 67 | 95 | 2 |
| Cincinnati | .465 | .443 | 75 | 87 | 3 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .519 | .530 | 84 | 78 | -2 |
| Arizona | .503 | .515 | 82 | 80 | -2 |
| Colorado | .455 | .443 | 74 | 88 | 2 |
| San Francisco | .449 | .422 | 73 | 89 | 4 |
| San Diego | .391 | .422 | 64 | 98 | -5 |
Labels:
angels,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
mets,
mlb,
phillies,
prediction,
predictive,
pythagorean,
rays,
record,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
twins,
white sox
Saturday, September 20, 2008
8: Can the White Sox Hold On? Will The Phillies Do To The Brewers This Year What They Did To The Mets Last Year?
With the Twins not able to shake the Rays, they are ceding the AL Central to the White Sox. The Dodgers look to be holding off the Diamondbacks. And with the Brewers' pitiful slide the last two weeks, Both the Mets and the Phillies will be making the Playoffs.
This last actually might not be good for the Cubs, because they have to play a much better team the NL Worst's Dodgers to advance to the next round, either the Mets or Phillies. On the other hand, none of the teams would have fared very well with the Cubs' home advantage.
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| Tampa Bay | .599 | .569 | 97 | 65 | 5 |
| Boston | .584 | .606 | 95 | 67 | -3 |
| NY Yankees | .542 | .530 | 88 | 74 | 2 |
| Toronto | .535 | .574 | 87 | 75 | -6 |
| Baltimore | .438 | .462 | 71 | 91 | -4 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .556 | .561 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .539 | .554 | 87 | 75 | -2 |
| Cleveland | .497 | .525 | 81 | 81 | -5 |
| Kansas City | .448 | .424 | 72 | 90 | 4 |
| Detroit | .467 | .493 | 76 | 86 | -4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .614 | .549 | 99 | 63 | 11 |
| Texas | .487 | .457 | 79 | 83 | 5 |
| Oakland | .474 | .478 | 77 | 85 | -1 |
| Seattle | .370 | .398 | 60 | 102 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| NY Mets | .562 | .565 | 91 | 71 | -1 |
| Philadelphia | .558 | .576 | 91 | 71 | -3 |
| Florida | .529 | .503 | 86 | 76 | 4 |
| Atlanta | .435 | .477 | 71 | 91 | -7 |
| Washington | .377 | .383 | 61 | 101 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| x-Chicago Cubs | .608 | .622 | 99 | 63 | -2 |
| Milwaukee | .542 | .532 | 88 | 74 | 2 |
| Houston | .529 | .474 | 85 | 77 | 9 |
| St. Louis | .519 | .525 | 84 | 78 | -1 |
| Pittsburgh | .416 | .407 | 67 | 95 | 1 |
| Cincinnati | .468 | .448 | 76 | 86 | 3 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .519 | .529 | 84 | 78 | -2 |
| Arizona | .497 | .507 | 81 | 81 | -2 |
| Colorado | .461 | .450 | 75 | 87 | 2 |
| San Francisco | .448 | .423 | 72 | 90 | 4 |
| San Diego | .383 | .415 | 62 | 100 | -5 |
Labels:
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
mets,
mlb,
phillies,
prediction,
predictive,
pythagorean,
rays,
record,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Thursday, September 18, 2008
10: Picture is getting clearer...
OK, what do you want me to say? Will Boston beat Tampa Bay? Well it's very likely considering the Rays are way overperforming. But they've been doing so all year, so what else is new--maybe this is their level.
It really doesn't matter, though, because the Red Sox will still be in the playoffs. The Sox of a paler persuasion should be able to hold off the Gemini, but it is still a tossup, really. Ozzie's crew isn't overperforming like the past, but the Twins are underperforming considerably, so some changes can still occur.
For my buds in NYC, I hope the Mets make it, but it does appear to be going down to the wire. And Torre's trolley Dodgers (where there are none) will most likely make the playoffs.
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| Tampa Bay | .596 | .562 | 96 | 66 | 6 |
| Boston | .586 | .608 | 95 | 67 | -4 |
| Toronto | .536 | .574 | 87 | 75 | -6 |
| NY Yankees | .536 | .529 | 87 | 75 | 1 |
| Baltimore | .444 | .463 | 72 | 90 | -3 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .553 | .558 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .542 | .561 | 88 | 74 | -3 |
| Cleveland | .493 | .525 | 80 | 82 | -5 |
| Detroit | .470 | .494 | 76 | 86 | -4 |
| Kansas City | .451 | .427 | 73 | 89 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .612 | .548 | 98 | 64 | 10 |
| Texas | .490 | .457 | 79 | 83 | 5 |
| Oakland | .467 | .475 | 76 | 86 | -1 |
| Seattle | .375 | .399 | 61 | 101 | -4 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .562 | .582 | 91 | 71 | -3 |
| NY Mets | .559 | .563 | 91 | 71 | -1 |
| Florida | .526 | .499 | 85 | 77 | 4 |
| Atlanta | .438 | .479 | 71 | 91 | -7 |
| Washington | .379 | .385 | 61 | 101 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Cubs | .609 | .628 | 99 | 63 | -3 |
| Milwaukee | .549 | .539 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Houston | .526 | .471 | 85 | 77 | 9 |
| St. Louis | .520 | .522 | 84 | 78 | 0 |
| Cincinnati | .461 | .440 | 74 | 88 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | .418 | .409 | 68 | 94 | 1 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .523 | .534 | 85 | 77 | -2 |
| Arizona | .500 | .508 | 81 | 81 | -1 |
| Colorado | .458 | .449 | 74 | 88 | 1 |
| San Francisco | .444 | .418 | 72 | 90 | 4 |
| San Diego | .379 | .410 | 62 | 100 | -5 |
Labels:
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
major,
mets,
minnesota,
mlb,
phillies,
predictive,
pythagorean,
rays,
record,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
sox,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
11: Cubs, Red Sox, Rays as good as clinched, White Sox and Dodgers should do so also; Mets, Phillies, and Brewers Still a Tossup
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| Tampa Bay | .597 | .560 | 96 | 66 | 6 |
| Boston | .589 | .614 | 96 | 66 | -4 |
| Toronto | .530 | .573 | 86 | 76 | -7 |
| NY Yankees | .530 | .522 | 86 | 76 | 1 |
| Baltimore | .450 | .464 | 73 | 89 | -2 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .560 | .566 | 91 | 71 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .543 | .562 | 88 | 74 | -3 |
| Cleveland | .490 | .524 | 80 | 82 | -5 |
| Detroit | .467 | .485 | 76 | 86 | -3 |
| Kansas City | .444 | .415 | 72 | 90 | 5 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .613 | .548 | 99 | 63 | 11 |
| Texas | .493 | .464 | 80 | 82 | 5 |
| Oakland | .467 | .476 | 76 | 86 | -1 |
| Seattle | .380 | .408 | 62 | 100 | -5 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| Philadelphia | .556 | .578 | 90 | 72 | -4 |
| NY Mets | .553 | .559 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Florida | .520 | .485 | 84 | 78 | 6 |
| Atlanta | .444 | .483 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .384 | .388 | 62 | 100 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Cubs | .611 | .632 | 99 | 63 | -3 |
| Milwaukee | .550 | .538 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Houston | .533 | .485 | 86 | 76 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .520 | .523 | 84 | 78 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .460 | .438 | 74 | 88 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh | .417 | .404 | 67 | 95 | 2 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .523 | .540 | 85 | 77 | -3 |
| Arizona | .493 | .507 | 80 | 82 | -2 |
| Colorado | .454 | .448 | 73 | 89 | 1 |
| San Francisco | .450 | .418 | 73 | 89 | 5 |
| San Diego | .382 | .411 | 62 | 100 | -5 |
Labels:
angels,
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
mets,
mlb,
phillies,
predictive,
pythagorean,
rays,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Monday, September 15, 2008
12: Cubs Have Basically Clinched, Other Races Still Too Close To Call
Although also the Rays and Red Sox have clinched playoff spots, though not the divisional standings. Why do I say those things? Basically, the Cubs have won 90 games, and the prediction for Milwaukee is 89, so it's basically over in the division. I would say that Milwaukee can hold off the Phillies, but that's what the Mets said last year...
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| Tampa Bay | .595 | .560 | 96 | 66 | 6 |
| Boston | .593 | .615 | 96 | 66 | -3 |
| Toronto | .533 | .575 | 87 | 75 | -7 |
| NY Yankees | .533 | .525 | 86 | 76 | 1 |
| Baltimore | .446 | .463 | 72 | 90 | -3 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .557 | .564 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .547 | .565 | 89 | 73 | -3 |
| Cleveland | .487 | .522 | 79 | 83 | -6 |
| Detroit | .470 | .486 | 76 | 86 | -3 |
| Kansas City | .440 | .413 | 71 | 91 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .617 | .554 | 99 | 63 | 10 |
| Texas | .490 | .463 | 79 | 83 | 4 |
| Oakland | .463 | .470 | 75 | 87 | -1 |
| Seattle | .383 | .410 | 62 | 100 | -4 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| NY Mets | .557 | .560 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Philadelphia | .553 | .578 | 90 | 72 | -4 |
| Florida | .517 | .482 | 83 | 79 | 6 |
| Atlanta | .447 | .484 | 73 | 89 | -6 |
| Washington | .380 | .388 | 62 | 100 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Cubs | .608 | .632 | 99 | 63 | -4 |
| Milwaukee | .553 | .539 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Houston | .537 | .487 | 86 | 76 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .523 | .527 | 85 | 77 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .456 | .434 | 74 | 88 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh | .420 | .406 | 68 | 94 | 2 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .520 | .537 | 84 | 78 | -3 |
| Arizona | .490 | .505 | 80 | 82 | -2 |
| San Francisco | .453 | .420 | 73 | 89 | 5 |
| Colorado | .450 | .443 | 73 | 89 | 1 |
| San Diego | .384 | .415 | 63 | 99 | -5 |
Labels:
angels,
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
magic #,
magic number,
mets,
mlb,
phillies,
pythagorean,
rays,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Sunday, September 14, 2008
13: New Stat Retraction and Back to the Standings
I apologize for bringing out my new stat before prime-time--I need to work on it some more.
Back to the Predictive Standings, then. Anything interesting left in this season? First, what isn't interesting: Rays, Red Sox, and Angels are in the playoffs--it's just a matter of who plays who in the playoffs; Cubs are still the best in the NL and judging by tonight's no-no by the Zambino, looks like they'll be tough in the playoffs.
What is interesting:
- White Sox or Twins? Both of these teams are literally going to fight this to the end, and possibly a one-game playoff.
- Mets should hold off the Phillies. The only question is whether the Phillies go on a winning streak to match their record with their performance, much like last year at this time.
- Also, Brewers vs. Phillies. The Brewers look like they're fading fast, but if they play to their overperforming level, they should still be able to win the Wild Card. If OPI says anything, it is that the Phillies are underperforming by 4 games and the Brewers are overperforming by 2 games, so this might get more interesting rather than less.
- And in the NL West, even though the stats show LA to win, this is probably far from over with how bad the D'Backs and Dodgers have played all year. Can Torre continue the playoff run he started in New York? It certainly doesn't look like the Yankees will continue that run this year...
| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| Tampa Bay | .603 | .571 | 97 | 65 | 5 |
| Boston | .588 | .610 | 96 | 66 | -4 |
| Toronto | .537 | .576 | 87 | 75 | -6 |
| NY Yankees | .527 | .521 | 85 | 77 | 1 |
| Baltimore | .442 | .460 | 72 | 90 | -3 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .555 | .562 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .554 | .569 | 90 | 72 | -3 |
| Cleveland | .486 | .528 | 79 | 83 | -7 |
| Detroit | .479 | .491 | 78 | 84 | -2 |
| Kansas City | .432 | .402 | 70 | 92 | 5 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .615 | .553 | 99 | 63 | 10 |
| Texas | .490 | .463 | 79 | 83 | 4 |
| Oakland | .459 | .467 | 75 | 87 | -1 |
| Seattle | .388 | .412 | 63 | 99 | -4 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| NY Mets | .565 | .567 | 92 | 70 | 0 |
| Philadelphia | .547 | .573 | 89 | 73 | -4 |
| Florida | .514 | .481 | 83 | 79 | 5 |
| Atlanta | .443 | .481 | 72 | 90 | -6 |
| Washington | .378 | .383 | 61 | 101 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Cubs | .603 | .626 | 98 | 64 | -4 |
| Milwaukee | .561 | .546 | 91 | 71 | 2 |
| Houston | .544 | .495 | 87 | 75 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .527 | .531 | 85 | 77 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .453 | .433 | 73 | 89 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | .419 | .405 | 68 | 94 | 2 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .520 | .533 | 84 | 78 | -2 |
| Arizona | .490 | .505 | 80 | 82 | -2 |
| San Francisco | .453 | .418 | 73 | 89 | 6 |
| Colorado | .450 | .446 | 73 | 89 | 1 |
| San Diego | .383 | .410 | 62 | 100 | -4 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)