| AL | |||||
| EAST | WP | P WP | P W | P L | OPI |
| Tampa Bay | .595 | .560 | 96 | 66 | 6 |
| Boston | .593 | .615 | 96 | 66 | -3 |
| Toronto | .533 | .575 | 87 | 75 | -7 |
| NY Yankees | .533 | .525 | 86 | 76 | 1 |
| Baltimore | .446 | .463 | 72 | 90 | -3 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Sox | .557 | .564 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Minnesota | .547 | .565 | 89 | 73 | -3 |
| Cleveland | .487 | .522 | 79 | 83 | -6 |
| Detroit | .470 | .486 | 76 | 86 | -3 |
| Kansas City | .440 | .413 | 71 | 91 | 4 |
| WEST | |||||
| x-LA Angels | .617 | .554 | 99 | 63 | 10 |
| Texas | .490 | .463 | 79 | 83 | 4 |
| Oakland | .463 | .470 | 75 | 87 | -1 |
| Seattle | .383 | .410 | 62 | 100 | -4 |
| NL | |||||
| EAST | |||||
| NY Mets | .557 | .560 | 90 | 72 | -1 |
| Philadelphia | .553 | .578 | 90 | 72 | -4 |
| Florida | .517 | .482 | 83 | 79 | 6 |
| Atlanta | .447 | .484 | 73 | 89 | -6 |
| Washington | .380 | .388 | 62 | 100 | -1 |
| CENTRAL | |||||
| Chicago Cubs | .608 | .632 | 99 | 63 | -4 |
| Milwaukee | .553 | .539 | 89 | 73 | 2 |
| Houston | .537 | .487 | 86 | 76 | 8 |
| St. Louis | .523 | .527 | 85 | 77 | -1 |
| Cincinnati | .456 | .434 | 74 | 88 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh | .420 | .406 | 68 | 94 | 2 |
| WEST | |||||
| LA Dodgers | .520 | .537 | 84 | 78 | -3 |
| Arizona | .490 | .505 | 80 | 82 | -2 |
| San Francisco | .453 | .420 | 73 | 89 | 5 |
| Colorado | .450 | .443 | 73 | 89 | 1 |
| San Diego | .384 | .415 | 63 | 99 | -5 |
Monday, September 15, 2008
12: Cubs Have Basically Clinched, Other Races Still Too Close To Call
Although also the Rays and Red Sox have clinched playoff spots, though not the divisional standings. Why do I say those things? Basically, the Cubs have won 90 games, and the prediction for Milwaukee is 89, so it's basically over in the division. I would say that Milwaukee can hold off the Phillies, but that's what the Mets said last year...
Labels:
angels,
baseball,
bill james,
cubs,
dodgers,
magic #,
magic number,
mets,
mlb,
phillies,
pythagorean,
rays,
red sox,
sabermetrics,
standings,
twins,
white sox
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment